‘Amanpour & Company’ sharpens focus on timely topics, guests chosen for PBS late-night viewers

Print More

Rahoul Ghose/PBS

Stephen Segaller and Christiane Amanpour speak at the Television Critics Association Press Tour in Los Angeles July 30 to promote the relaunch of Amanpour's talk show on PBS and CNN International.

For nearly a decade, Christiane Amanpour’s half-hour daily show on CNN International was a magnet for bland politicians, analysts and experts from around the world.

Now expanded to an hour and supplemented with a team of correspondents, it has shed many of those dowdy feathers and broken out of self-imposed boundaries.

In its first installments, Amanpour & Company, PBS’ new late-night public affairs show, tackled tennis, treaties, trade, Trump and truthfulness in media. It promises to lift curtains, escort viewers backstage and shine spotlights on complicated issues.

The reworking of the CNN International show began in December, when PBS picked it up as a replacement for its late-night staple Charlie Rose. In its expanded format, Amanpour & Company usually features two interviews by London-based Amanpour, an award-winning television journalist and former war correspondent.

The third segment originates from WNET in New York City, where one of four regular correspondents tapes prerecorded interviews: author and journalist Walter Isaacson, NPR Weekend Edition host Michel Martin, TV commentator and podcaster Alicia Menendez and PBS NewsHour Weekend anchor Hari Screenivasan. CNN’s team pulls together the interviews together for each program.

Rahoul Ghose/PBS


Amanpour started the Sept. 10 premiere with an interview with Kellyanne Conway, advisor and spokesperson for President Trump, challenging her forcefully on Trump’s assertion that the media are the “enemy of the people.”

Tuesday’s show opened with Amanpour talking to tennis great Billie Jean King, proof that Amanpour & Company could react swiftly to controversy. In this case it was the stunning conclusion of the women’s championship match in the U.S. Open tennis tournament two days earlier, which Serena Williams lost to Naomi Osaka of Japan.

The first episodes of the reconfigured talk show were produced in New York, but Amanpour plans to return to London.

The broadcast is a byproduct of PBS’ abrupt cancellation of Charlie Rose in November following revelations of the host’s sexual harassment of young female employees.

Charlie Rose had been a late-night flagship of PBS since the early 1990s. When it was dumped from the lineup, PBS programmers scheduled repeats of Antiques Roadshow in its place. With a gaping hole in PBS’ public affairs slate, executives at WNET in New York City moved to find an alternative.

“We felt there was an obligation to our audience to quickly produce some relevant, topical, timely programming,” said Stephen Segaller, WNET VP of national production.

Segaller’s boss, WNET President Neal Shapiro, heard from CNN President Jeff Zucker, a former colleague from NBC News. Zucker offered Amanpour’s nightly CNN international show as a replacement, no fees attached.

During his nearly 20 years at WNET, Segaller had discussed potential late-night shows with outside producers. On occasion he would pursue Amanpour as a correspondent or narrator for documentaries or other public affairs programs. Those stars had not aligned until that moment, he said.

Amanpour, 60, became a familiar television correspondent to Americans when she reported for CNN during the Gulf War. She has ocasionally reported for CBS’ 60 Minutes. Over her career, she has won a Peabody Award, two George Polk Awards and 11 Emmys.

Her half-hour CNN International show, Amanpour, debuted in 2009 and contained a sprinkling of news. Each episode primarily featured a single interview based on current events.

When PBS hastily picked up the program in December, the content of the PBS and CNN versions was essentially the same. It was retitled Amanpour on PBS and stripped of CNN news crawls and commercial breaks. But Amanpour and her producers started booking guests with American viewers in mind.

“I’ve done an internal tweak since I’ve been on PBS,” Amanpour said during an appearance at the Television Critics Association Summer 2018 Press Tour in July. “I’ve fully embraced the fact that I now have this American platform, and I try to make it as friendly to an American audience as it would be to a global audience.”

Amanpour told the critics she also expanded the range of interviewees, particularly from the worlds of entertainment and pop culture. As examples, she pointed to interviews with Ian McKellen, who talked about starring in a new production of King Lear, and Glenn Close and Jonathan Pryce, who promoted their new movie The Wife. Jennifer Lawrence dropped by, as did Sting.

“Maybe I wouldn’t have done those necessarily [just for] CNN. It wouldn’t have crossed my mind,” she said. “But I love it. It’s great. It really expands my mind.”

International viewers don’t mind the change in emphasis, she said. “There are some really sophisticated people around the world, and they love to hear about America. They love American culture, and they certainly love the political drama in America right now,” she said. “And they even love American sports.”

In the new show, viewers can expect to see even more of Amanpour’s mind-expanding interviews. Upcoming guests include Sarah Jessica Parker and legal expert Alan Dershowitz. Meanwhile, correspondents have interviewed IBM CEO Ginni Rometty, actor Alan Alda, filmmaker Ken Burns, British broadcaster and actress Jameela Jamil and former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara.

“We’re each bringing a great deal to the new show,” WNET’s Segaller said.

Programmers and GMs at PBS stations expressed enthusiasm about Amanpour & Company. “We’re hoping the expanded format and additional contributors will bring a broader range of topics and voices to the late-night space,” said Ron Bachman, senior director of programming at WGBH in Boston. “There’s an appetite among our audience for more in-depth interviews of the issues of the day than can be found elsewhere.”

With Amanpour & Company, PBS regains the most important aspect of Charlie Rose — the big, important interview of the day, said Rich Homberg, CEO at Detroit Public Television. The timely conversations on Rose’s broadcast had become a signature of PBS’ late nights, drawing viewers who are serious about public affairs and selective about what they watch.

The collaboration between producers at WNET and CNN requires coordination across a half-dozen time zones. Each CNN show debuts in London at 7 p.m. local time and airs in the eastern U.S. nine hours later.

Scott Davis is executive producer for the WNET program. His counterparts at CNN are executive editor Annabel Archer in London and executive producer Liza McGuirk in New York.

The two teams plan simultaneously on two tracks, technical and editorial, Davis said. On the technical side, Davis’ team works out promos and transfer of content, right down to audio specs.

Davis coordinates interview requests to make sure the CNN and WNET teams don’t inadvertently compete for the same guest.

“If we are doing our jobs, we’ll have a diverse set of guests talking about a diverse set of topics,” Davis said. “It might be science, technology, the arts, politics, sports or the intersection of all those things. This is the only place where you can do all those things and let the interviews run for 15 to 20 minutes.”

Some guests are selected and interviewed well in advance. “Day of” interviews require more coordination with CNN. Amanpour is more likely to handle interviews based on the day’s events, though correspondents might tape segments that mesh with those stories.

Scott Davis

“There will also be hours when those three interviews are not related, and that’s okay, too,” Davis said. “So first we ask, ‘Who would be interesting to have on the show and why?’ And then, ‘How do we coordinate with our friends at CNN to make the best hour every night?’”

The staff at WNET can turn interviews around quickly, Davis said. But for now each edition is prerecorded, and the ability to produce live programs isn’t under consideration.

Ultimately, the show is the vision of Amanpour. “But it’s not without input from our folks in public television,” Davis said.

During its short run, Amanpour on PBS couldn’t hold on to Charlie Rose’s audience. Researchers at TRAC Media reported that year-to-year household ratings from the months of January through July declined 29 percent from 2017 to 2018. The expanded format and addition of prominent correspondents could make a difference for the coming season.

Segaller pointed out that carriage for Amanpour & Company is effectively 100 percent. “I think there’s a lot of enthusiasm at a lot of stations for the show,” he said. And, he added, “ratings are only one measure” of a program’s success on PBS.

“What we’re looking for in a show over time is that it builds an incredibly loyal audience,” he said. “I would be surprised if, over time, it would be any lower than the audience that watched Charlie.”

4 thoughts on “‘Amanpour & Company’ sharpens focus on timely topics, guests chosen for PBS late-night viewers

  1. As an American viewer in Europe, I’m fascinated by what CNN International has done with the “Amanpour” talk show. But I had no idea why the network had doubled her time before reading your story. I’ve always found her interviews both tough and timely, but your article offered me a first glimpse of the behind-the-scenes effort to reshape the show’s appeal to meet PBS Needs in light of Charlie Rose’s banishment. It’s a coup for those of us focused on the CNN program’s enhanced content. Now I have added reason to watch it. Serious dedicated globalized journalism with input from the likes of Walter Isaacson and others of the same stature!.

  2. I’m an American viewer who started watching the short-form version of the show and immediately made it a “must-watch” on my viewing schedule. The long-form Amanpour & Company is even more strongly on that list, as it gives me in-depth reporting/opinion on a wide variety of topics and from a remarkable variety of people whose opinions are actually worth hearing. I hope it more than regains the viewers that Rose had, as I think Amanpour is doing a better job than Rose did.

  3. I have only recently become familiar with your program. I now watch it every night. I feel for the first time that I am getting realistic news and comments from well educated, well known and really smart people. It doesn’t hurt to have a beautiful and brilliant hostess. I do adore your vocabulary. Thank you to all who work so hard to pull off interesting, passionate, well educated and thoughtful issues to the forefront..

  4. Mrs Amanpour, thank you for touching the issue of abortion , is a big deal for all of us woman. I can see that in the Supreme Court are mostly man who don’t understand woman issues … can anyone see how many foster kids are in the states , how many kids go to college or university, is the government helping giving the needs that the kid and mother needs to survive, to live as a human being and not in a hurry ….adding to that , we woman have rights and that’s our right ….
    If we go by scientist and or religion issue, come on, think about it, to understand life you need to breath . A fetus breath at the average of 21 days that’s when it’s life starts …
    another issue ( in this economy , do you want to have a kid )
    COVID issues
    War in Ukraine
    The economy in the states is getting from bad to worse
    Gas prices are high to the sky
    Food , expensive
    People is getting lay-off because some restaurants are closing due to COVID which is the core of the economy problems .
    supreme Court judges , I’m talking about the male, Put yourselves in our shoes , as a middle class or low class citizen and as a woman, what will you do with a kid , no money, no job, no place to go ….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *